Lamb, M. E., & Gilbride, K. When you look at the W. Ickes (Ed.), Appropriate and you may incompatible dating (pp. 33-60). Nyc: Springer-Verlag. [ Website links ]

Perceived resemblance and dating achievement certainly dating people: An idiographic method

Lee, L., Loewenstein, G., Ariely, D., Hong, J., & Younger, J. (2008). In the event that I am not very hot, are you presently sizzling hot or not?: Physical-elegance critiques and you will matchmaking choice given that a purpose of an individual’s very own appeal. Psychological Science, 19, 669677. [ Website links ]

Levinger, Grams., & Rands, M. (1985)patibility in marriage and other personal dating. Into the W. Ickes (Ed.), Appropriate and in conflict relationships (pp. 309-331). Nyc: Springer-Verlag. [ Links ]

Lewin, K., Dembo, T., Festinger, L., & Sears, P. (1944). Number of ambition. During the J. McV. Take a look (Ed.), Character and also the behavior issues (Vol. step 1, pp. 333378). Ny: Ronald Press. [ Links ]

Loving, T. J. (2006). Predicting relationship matchmaking future with insiders’ and you will outsiders’ perspective: Just who and you will what exactly is questioned issues. Individual Relationships mest populГ¤ra slaviska datingsida, 13, 349-362. [ Hyperlinks ]

Luo, S., & Klohnen, Age. C. (2005). Assortative mating and you can relationship top quality for the newly weds: One or two centered method. Log of Identification and you can Public Psychology, 88, 304-326. [ Backlinks ]

Madden, M., & Lenhart, A beneficial. (2006). Dating. Washington, DC: Statement to the Pew Internet sites & Western Existence Opportunity. Retrieved , of [ Website links ]

MacDonald, T. K., & Ross, Meters. (1999). Evaluating the precision off forecasts from the relationship matchmaking: Just how and why would lovers’ forecasts range from those individuals made by perceiver? Identity and you will Personal Mindset Bulletin, twenty-five, 14171429. [ Website links ]

ater, J., & Smith, S. (1982). Legitimizing facts regarding the initiation off heterosexual dating. Papers shown in the Very first In the world Meeting to your Individual Dating, Madison, WI. [ Links ]

Merkle, Age.Roentgen., & Richardson, Roentgen.A great. (2000). Electronic relationships and you can digital related: Conceptualizing desktop mediated personal relationships. Friends, 44, 187-192. [ Hyperlinks ]

Montoya, R. M., Horton, R. S., & Kirchner, J. (2008). Is actually actual similarity essential for attraction? A great meta-study from genuine and thought of similarity. Journal out of Societal and personal Matchmaking, twenty five, 889-922. [ Website links ]

Morry, M. Yards. (2005). Dating pleasure given that an excellent predictor off similarity ratings; An examination of the attraction-similarity theory. Journal out of Public and personal Relationships, 22, 561-584. [ Hyperlinks ]

Record of Personal and personal Relationship, 23, 865-880

Morry, Meters. Yards. (2007). The fresh new attraction-resemblance theory one of get across-sex nearest and dearest: Relationship fulfillment, understood similarities, and thinking-offering attitudes. Diary away from Personal and private Relationship, 24, 117-138. [ Website links ]

Murstein, B. I. (1987). An explanation and extension of the SVR concept off dyadic pairing. Journal away from ily, 49, 929-947. [ Links ]

Orbuch, T. L., Veroff, J. Hassan, H., & Horrocks, J. (2002). Who can split up: A good 14-season longitudinal study of black people and light people. Journal regarding Social and private Matchmaking, 19, 179-202. [ Links ]

Orenstein, S. (). This new like formula Meets believes it’s discover a formula to possess governing the web based dating providers: A technological strategy for finding Mr. otherwise Ms. Best. Team dos.0 Journal. Retrieved with the regarding [ Hyperlinks ]

Rammstedt, B., & Schupp, J. (2008). Just the congruent survive – Identity parallels in lovers. Identification and you may Private Differences, forty-five, 533-535. [ Website links ]

Regan, P. C., Levin, L., Sprecher, S., Christopher, S., & Cate, Roentgen. (2000). Partner preferences: Just what qualities manage individuals desire inside their quick-title sexual and you may long-term romantic lovers? Diary regarding Therapy and you can People Sexuality, 12, 1-21. [ Hyperlinks ]

Reis, H. T. (1985). This new role of the mind about initiation and you will span of societal correspondence. Into the W. Ickes (Ed.), Suitable and you will incompatible relationships (pp. 209-231). Nyc: Sprinter-Verlag. [ Links ]